|
Post by l47aurora on Apr 29, 2015 14:09:54 GMT -6
I've been curious lately to find out what northstar stock parts are better for performance like for example if the primary tubes on the 4.6 exhaust manifolds are larger then the 4.0 exhaust manifolds or the intake runners are larger
|
|
XJSman89
Administrator
Posts: 6,309
Staff Member
|
Post by XJSman89 on Apr 29, 2015 19:48:09 GMT -6
Intake runners are the same for both the 4.0 and 4.6. As far as I know, the exhaust is as well. I believe the extra displacement is accomplished by a larger bore. From what I recall, the stroke is the same for both motors. The rest of the extra horsepower can be attributed to a different cam, at least in the VIN Y. There's only a 25 HP difference between our 4.0 and the 4.6 VIN Y, and 50 for the VIN 9. Not a whole lot of room for changes there! If it's HP you're looking for, just do a VIN 9 swap. Or the VIN Y for torque.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 3 using ProBoards
|
|
|
Post by l47aurora on Apr 29, 2015 20:57:02 GMT -6
Alright, I had heard before that the exhaust manifolds had larger primaries and collectors on the vin Y but I thought where better to ask then here but I knew about the vin Y cams but I thought I'll see what simpler things that can be done first, so far I've been just thinking higher voltage coil packs like msd's and different plug wires and hopefully down the road somewhere dual 2 1/4 exhaust
|
|
|
Post by l47aurora on Apr 29, 2015 20:58:07 GMT -6
Sorry I meant the vin 9 cams
|
|
tigger
Administrator
Posts: 2,844
Staff Member
|
Post by tigger on Apr 29, 2015 22:02:58 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by l47aurora on Apr 29, 2015 22:40:51 GMT -6
I've never pulled an engine or transmission from a fwd car, I have rwd but those were also non computer controlled vehicles and I've heard it's a pain, the newest car I've worked on before my aurora was a 1990 Plymouth acclaim but that's pre obd but I never pulled the engine or trans out of it
|
|
|
Post by sall on Apr 30, 2015 6:28:14 GMT -6
MSD coils will yield zero gains. Just red dress up in the engine compartment. Front and rear manifolds are the same as the part # cross references. Though it has been said otherwise. Cross references are usually spot on.
Front: 12556488
Cadillac Concours 4DR 1996 Cadillac Deville 4DR Base 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 Cadillac Deville 4DR CONCOURS 1998, 1999 Cadillac Deville 4DR DELEGANCE 1998, 1999 Cadillac Deville 4DR HEARSE 1998, 1999 Cadillac Deville 4DR LIMO 1998, 1999 Cadillac Eldorado 2DR Base 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 Cadillac Eldorado 2DR Touring 1998, 1999 Cadillac Seville 4DR Base 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 Cadillac Seville 4DR SLS 1998, 1999 Cadillac Seville 4DR STS 1998, 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora 4DR Base 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999
Rear: 3544523
Cadillac Concours 4DR 1996 Cadillac Deville 4DR Base 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 Cadillac Deville 4DR CONCOURS 1998, 1999 Cadillac Deville 4DR DELEGANCE 1998, 1999 Cadillac Deville 4DR HEARSE 1998, 1999 Cadillac Deville 4DR LIMO 1998, 1999 Cadillac Eldorado 2DR Base 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 Cadillac Eldorado 2DR Touring 1998, 1999 Cadillac Seville 4DR Base 1996, 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora 4DR Base 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999
|
|
|
Post by l47aurora on Apr 30, 2015 12:08:04 GMT -6
Thanks for that cross reference, I hadn't seen that before, it's looking like their is less that can done then I thought, I've been thinking about picking up another set of exhaust manifolds and porting them so that way while I worked on them the car wouldn't be down
|
|
|
Post by l47aurora on Apr 30, 2015 12:17:32 GMT -6
I just noticed with that cross reference that the newest year on it is 1999 but that makes me wonder was different in 2000, I don't think it would be much of a difference between the 2000 and up exhaust manifolds and 1999 and down but basically has peaked my curiosity
|
|
XJSman89
Administrator
Posts: 6,309
Staff Member
|
Post by XJSman89 on Apr 30, 2015 14:57:22 GMT -6
My guess is that there were some minor tweaks on the 2G (which actually skipped the 2000 model year, starts with 2001), so they don't directly swap. Or they weren't comfortable saying that they swapped. I'm actually unsure if a 2G 4.0 is that different, I've never asked. Might be nice to know. I know it uses different (larger) injectors and coil on plug ignition, so chances are there are some other changes as well. Just because it's a 4.0 doesn't mean its the same. The body is definitely different (duh) so my guess is that the exhaust is routed differently. A different angle on the mounting flange for the flex tube would warrant a different part number even if the motor was the same.
|
|
|
Post by sall on Apr 30, 2015 15:23:44 GMT -6
Plenty of differences between the two gens... as for manifolds see bolded red below.
|
|
tigger
Administrator
Posts: 2,844
Staff Member
|
Post by tigger on Apr 30, 2015 17:08:49 GMT -6
^LOL! I was reading that exact post on the Caddy forum last week! Good stuff, however;
I strongly disagree. Let's just say, "It'll run and not knock on 87 octane fuel", haha!
|
|
|
Post by l47aurora on Apr 30, 2015 20:09:55 GMT -6
I know I've ran lower octane fuels in one of my vehicles (not my aurora)before once but noticed worse gas mileage and significantly worse performance but I run premium in everything except for that one time
|
|
|
Post by l47aurora on Apr 30, 2015 20:18:22 GMT -6
I was also curious what kind of horsepower gains dual 2 1/4 exhaust I could roughly expect, from what I've heard the stock exhaust does not flow very well at all but I was thinking probably roughly around a 20 hp gain at the crank being that someone already eliminated the catalytic converter and down stream Co2 sensors I should be able to run dual exhaust without catalytic converters and the car isn't currently throwing any codes for the down stream co2 sensors
|
|
Randy T.
Administrator
☯ AURORA GXP ☯
Posts: 3,758
Staff Member
|
Post by Randy T. on May 1, 2015 6:23:04 GMT -6
The Classic Aurora exhaust manifolds and crossover pipe are a double walled design. I noticed on this vin "9" Cadillac motor(like in an STS) has a different kind of exhaust on it, the vin "y" (SLS)has the Aurora type exhaust. I almost have it all apart, but I will find out what is going on. I also compared some Cadillac exhaust to Aurora exhaust, the Cadillacs had 1/4 inch bigger pipes at the tail pipe. When I get more time I will check it out better. aurorabrain said '06 DTS exhaust will bolt on, tail pipes need shortened and adjusted, and it's a 1/4 inch bigger. One of the Cadillacss I checked was an '06 DTS. "9" "Y"
|
|
Randy T.
Administrator
☯ AURORA GXP ☯
Posts: 3,758
Staff Member
|
Post by Randy T. on May 1, 2015 6:32:43 GMT -6
Don't forget about your flex pipe, it has a protrusion from poor assembly that should be ground off. Buy an extra, smooth it out, swap them out, they swap out easy as long as bolts don't break. Soak them days in advanced. This "9" flex pipe looks a little different, when I get it off I will compare to stock 4.0.
|
|
plato442
Aurora Driver
Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Oldsmobile...
|
Post by plato442 on May 1, 2015 8:38:43 GMT -6
back to your initial question, the Northstar engine (either VIN Y or 9) are both better for performance vs. your Aurora 4.0 engine.
|
|
|
Post by l47aurora on May 3, 2015 1:27:04 GMT -6
I really like what you did with your cam covers, the black then I'm assuming wet sanded the ribs
|
|